this is for the person who said: crimes against humanity = bad. true, they're bad. but, do you realize that crimes against humanity are being committed against humanity around the world, all the time. darfur, for example. the genocide in cambodia--in which case there are still mines scattered throughout the countryside. all around the world, people suffer. however, the bush administration strategically chose to attack iraq--why? um, for oil, for money...perhaps? we just all have to open our minds and think a little about this. hate to say this, but with all the intelligence technology, there is no way the government did not see the attacks on 9/11 comin' and basically let it happen. Why? to rally the uninformed american public and get them to back a war against iraq. the perfect tactic for the bush administration to get what it wanted, no? and thousands of lives had to pay for it. if we were so interested in crimes against humanity, our troops wouldn't be going abroad and committing atrocities on foreign soil. the massacres on innocents in vietnam during the vietnam war, the rapes on young iraqi girls and the subsequent slaying of the victim and their families. do you think this is how the united states of america should fight crimes against humanity? i think not. go to college, all of you who ignorantly consume all the propaganda that is fed to you.




