White House Peeved Michelle Obama Is in New PETA Ad

Celebrity News January 6, 2010 AT 9:52AM
White House Peeved Michelle Obama Is in New PETA Ad Credit: PETA

The White House is fuming over a new anti-fur campaign featuring first lady Michelle Obama.

She appears alongside Oprah Winfrey, Carrie Underwood and Tyra Banks -- who have all refused to wear real fur -- in "Fur-Free and Fabulous," PETA's new ad, which was unveiled last week and can be seen at Washington, D.C.-area Metro stations and on the group's website.

See Michelle Obama's most stylish moments

But the White House maintains that PETA had no right to use the image of the first lady in its new ads.

PETA president Ingrid Newkirk insists her organization wouldn't have sought Obama's consent for the ad because it knows that she can't make such an endorsement.

See Barack and Michelle Obama's wedding photo

"The fact is that Michelle Obama has issued a statement indicating that she doesn't wear fur, and the world should know that in PETA's eyes, that makes her pretty fabulous," she said in a press statement.

See fun photos of Bo, the White House dog

PETA senior vice president Dan Mathews added that Obama should be flattered. Introducing the campaign, he said: "By rejecting fur, these style icons demonstrate to the world that fur is old-fashioned and cruel."

Tell Us What You Think

57
Comment by signing in with or creating your Facebook account by clicking below.
  • February 02, 2010 - 10:01am mj fan

    "fedupwithhercrap" you can go fall in a hole

  • January 30, 2010 - 3:15pm Nick Northern

    Hmmm. I think I know why the terrorists hate you guys...

  • January 30, 2010 - 3:15pm Nick Northern

    Hmmm. I think I know why the terrorists hate you guys...

  • January 24, 2010 - 11:51pm Sylvia P. Wainer

    I would like to: 1) ask Kim what she bases on her aggressive comment that PETA are a bunch a of extremists. Better get yourself WELL informed about what these people do and have achieved, as well about where the money goes, before implying that in PETA's case you can't be as sure as with your local animal shelter. What to YOU may appear as an extremist action is the only way to make people aware of the horrors of animal suffering and make them look a little beyond their comfortable noses in their comfortable little neighborhoods. 2) Tell Mr. Bigpharma that PETA --yes--needs to be in the spotlight, BUT in order to call the attention of people just like him, who make themselves blind, deaf and dumb to the plight of other sentient beings. PETA does not "prevent" companies from making medicine for humans. They reach AGREEMENTS, after finding out that horrible experiments on animals are not really necessary, because there are other ways. And please: Who said that we human beings-- THE GREATEST PREDATORS ON EARTH-- have a right to inflict pain for OUR benefit? 3)Ask Erin what her source of information is that allows her to say that not a credible conservationit or scientist endorses PETA and, to top it all, that 90% of the animals taken in by PETA are killed! All of the above sound more like fanatics to me than anyone from PETA!

  • January 14, 2010 - 3:39pm catherine todd

    I agree wholeheartedly with Clarissa... well said! January 07, 2010 - 11:11am Clarissa Meyers Says: She should be proud to be in an ad for PETA and be allowed to speak about her stances on issues such as the cruelty of killing animals.

  • January 14, 2010 - 2:23pm Sel

    Like she doesn't own anything thing that isn't an animal? Like she is totaly vegan too? Yeah right!!

  • January 11, 2010 - 8:14pm fedupwithhercrap

    sj - your a fool if you think obama cares about the 'black man.' all 'hussein' cares about is the Muslims - you just wait.

  • January 11, 2010 - 8:10pm fedupwithhercrap

    Michelle Obama is a bleeding heart liberal - they should make a coat out of her.

  • January 11, 2010 - 1:58am Grace

    While Obama's press secretary said that MO does not wear fur, it is simply not true - she has a fox-trimmed parka (yes, REAL) that she wore sledding with the girls, and in Chaicago she wore a full-length mink for years.

  • January 09, 2010 - 10:21pm simon peter

    Doesn't PETA stand for "People Eating Tasty Animals"?

  • January 07, 2010 - 10:00pm Kim

    Right on, Mel! You said exactly what I wanted to. It's going to take a LONG time to clean up the mess Bush made of our country. PETA! Yuck! Far better to support a decent group like your local animal shelter. That way you know your money is actually helping animals, rather then supporting a bunch of extremists with a terror agenda.

  • January 07, 2010 - 11:11am Clarissa Meyers

    She should be proud to be in an ad for PETA and be allowed to speak about her stances on issues such as the cruelty of killing animals.

  • January 07, 2010 - 6:29am Mr. Bigpharma

    Peta and other animal rights groups are hypocrite. The should be put as a terrorist organization.They only attack superstars and companies that will put them in the spotlight. I have not seen they do something about the billion$ animal Porn industry. "They love animal so much" to sleep with. They also prevent big companies from making medicine to cure Human and animal diseases.Peta should be put in a Terrorist watch list for they violent act against citizens(for Kidnapping,Bombing,vandalizing etc..)

  • January 07, 2010 - 4:02am Nobodys Furfect

    We need all to unite and figure out our future this country is f**k Up!! Use to be my dream country. Ella I so totally agree with you.Some people they don;t just understand what's going on this country.Everybody hates america. :( You are american people can change this country. Fight for your right and do what's best for you people.It's a free country unless if it change to socialism.

  • January 07, 2010 - 3:58am Nobodys Furfect

    Everybody has their own opinion.Obama wants this country to change and he wants this country to be socialism.

  • January 07, 2010 - 3:32am Kim

    That really is disrespectful. I'm sure the First Lady would have loved to be on the PETA Ad, but jeez, at least ask her.

  • January 07, 2010 - 12:56am Cindy Miraglia

    Why is it okay for US Presidents and Vice Presidents to hunt and Not okay for the First Lady to be in a PETA ad?

  • January 07, 2010 - 12:19am Erin

    I agree with the white house being angry. This is a organization that brainwashes kids with campaigns like"Your mommy kills animals". Not exactly a group any country leader would want to endorse. They don't pay taxes, not a credible scientist or conservationist will indorse them, and they kill 90% of the animals they take in. Of course with the millions they make in danations just go to lobbying against any pet ownership and crappy photoshop adds as such.

  • January 06, 2010 - 11:55pm ann

    Go Oboma's!!!

  • January 06, 2010 - 11:53pm ann

    PETA That was nasty putting the First Lady on the cover without their concent. I believe in your cause however by being that disrespectful you just loose people's trust in your belief. "Two wrongs don't make a right"??? Sincerely Rea, Regina, Sk

ADVERTISEMENT