Comments

1 - 20 of 33 | Next »

• December 05, 2009 - 3:05pm Lilah Says:

  Man, this sucks. Rachelle fit the look of Victoria. This Bryce chick doesn't really cut it for me. And if what Kathleen Collins says is true, that's just plain wrong! Hopefully she doesn't f**k it up.

• November 21, 2009 - 8:46pm S.D.S Says:

  You guys really should give Bryce a chance! She is an amazing actress and I am sure that you all will love her.

• November 19, 2009 - 11:09pm anonymous Says:

  either the scummit moles are still trolling the internet to say nasty things about Rachelle and negatively impact her career or some of you people are just NASTY and clearly envious of the actress. . .goodness knows why. . .did she steal your job from you? Too cute? Too nice? Did she do too much charity work? Too down to earth? Not a Paris/Brittney/Lindsay nightmare? By the way, all her dialogue scenes were cut from New Moon by Scummit---they were the screen writers favorite scenes (she said so in an interview) and they were cut no doubt due to Summit's pettiness. I've read all the reviews, you know how harsh they are about Twilight etc. The only well reviewed scene in the whole film, by virtually every review, is the dialogue-free action scene with Rachelle. She has 2 other non-twilight movies coming out soon, granted they are not block-buster or tween films. But ultimately, Talent will out. And may all you nasty posters get the karmic nastiness directed right back at you.

• November 19, 2009 - 10:07pm Kathleen Collins Says:

  To:Twilight fan who claims to not be a psycho:Did I attack you? No.I am merely voicing an opinion of something which I feel passionate about. You, on the other hand seem to just be trolling around picking fights.If you don't have anything of substance to add, don't bother to post.

• November 18, 2009 - 9:34am b Says:

  Rachelle is the only one I can see being Victoria!! What are they thinking!!!

• November 18, 2009 - 9:17am Blue Shoes Says:

  Rachelle is 2 good for this movie. She will be on to bigger and better things. She is passionate about acting. Summit Entertainment is a passing fad and not accomodating Rachelle will be their undoing...they aren't "all that". Neither is Bryce HOWARD who doesn't bring to the role of Victoria what Rachelle brings. Ron doesn't own Hollywood and Bryce will be judged on her body of work and won't be able to rely on her last name indefinitely. The role of Victoria is more significant than ANY of the other roles! Best wishes 2 Rachelle... hope Honey is doing well. Of course, this is all just my opinion, but lots of my friends agree.

• November 17, 2009 - 9:26pm Maria Says:

  Not a fan of Bryce. Rachelle is the only person I see fit for the role. :'(

• November 17, 2009 - 8:24pm gina Says:

  bryce dallas howard is just trying to ride the twilight wave. It's also pretty lame all the actors didnt band together and say they wouldnt do another movie unless all the original actors were in it. I am sure if rob and kristen would have said something it would have been done. Way to stand together Twilight cast lol.

• November 17, 2009 - 7:47pm Heather Says:

  Anastasia Did you really just begin your post "wah wah" to try to illustrate 'In the real world, where grown ups work, things happen.'? Really?

• November 17, 2009 - 4:36pm Twilight Fan...but not psycho about it! Says:

  to Kathleen Collins......do you have a life outside the Twilight movies? There are many more things to worry about in this world. Movies are meant as entertainment and as an escape from ones everyday life.....they are not LIFE. I pity you as it seems you have no other interests since you are so beside yourself about this.

• November 17, 2009 - 4:14pm christy Says:

  Actually Bryce is an awesome actress... hate that Rachelle got fired, but no need in dissin' Bryce for it. It's Summit's fault.

• November 17, 2009 - 3:49pm gina Says:

  I think recasting her role is a horrible idea. Many fans of this will be pissed b/c its not going to be the same without her. she tuned in to victoria so well and no one can replace her.

• November 17, 2009 - 3:41pm selina Says:

  such crap she got fired. Bryce dallas howard is a horrible actress and is only using the role to try and make herself more famous. I hate summit for what they did to rachelle.

• November 17, 2009 - 3:15pm Chante Says:

  She should have attended and held her head high, not hide... show some backbone for goodness sake and thumb your nose at the studio. This would be the last chance she had to celebrate the role and her contribution.

• November 17, 2009 - 1:36pm bellaluna Says:

  Kathleen, that's what I wrote: Bryce turned down the role originally offered to her because "it was too small for her." That is not rumour, it is fact and it is in print.

• November 17, 2009 - 1:09pm Mrs.PFC.Boyd Says:

  Bryce was in The Villiage as well as Lady in the Water. She did a great job with both of those roles. It will be interesting to see her take over the role of Victoria... I thought Rachelle did a great job as Victoria in Twilight.

• November 17, 2009 - 12:59pm Kathleen Collins Says:

  I am still not over Rachelle's very premature 'dismissal' from the Twilight saga.She did not 'break' a contract.....the 2 weeks she was going to be doing the small independant movie were agreed on when she was hired for the first movie. This was a case of the producers looking for a loophole to exploit. It's extremely unfair and smells suspiciously like someone within Hollywood's ranks owed some director bigwig a favor...ala.."OK, if that's what you want Ron,... we'll stick your under achieving, spoiled daughter in our film". Bryce Dallas Howard stunk up M. Night Schamalan's "Lady In The Water'....and I thought it would have been nearly impossible to screw up something that man had written. Now she's gotten herself attached to a series of films that had become a sensation without her. This is annoying because she had originally been offered the part of Victoria in the very beginning, BEFORE filming began for Twilight, and she turned it down, probably because she didn't think the movie would be big enough for her 'huge talent'.Hollywood helps Hollywood....and Hollywood brats have the easiest time gaining stardom than actors that are 10 times more talented than they are. Now that the saga is the biggest thing this century...she wants to be on the winning team. This whole travesty was unfair to Rachelle and to the many Twilight fans who wanted the cast to remain as it was. I hope the critics and the fans don't forget this. Bryce Dallas Howard doesn't deserve to be in this film (or any other, based on her past performances).I used to have tremendous respect for her Dad, but I now see that he is just like any other pushy, over indulgent Hollywood exec....because nothing will convince me that his daughter won this role through conventional measures.

• November 17, 2009 - 12:57pm anonymous Says:

  aww :( eclipse isnt gonna be the same with a different victoria :(

• November 17, 2009 - 12:56pm bellaluna Says:

  Bryce was in the running for Victoria in the beginning, but "the role was too small" for an actress of her calibre *sarcasm* - that right there would have made me eliminate her from eligibility for the recast. No room in my movie for her ego.

• November 17, 2009 - 12:52pm Jon Says:

  I don't blame her!

1 - 20 of 33 | Next »