I really hate Jennifer Anniston. She is annoying. Go Brangelina!!! I knew that her and John Mayer would never last. Or her and Brad Pitt. She is 39, not married and has no kids. Wow

4:38 PM Anonymous Says:

EVERYONE HERE ARE VERY STUPIDS AND IDIOTS, ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ALL TIME, SO USA IS BEEING THE WORSE COUNTRY OF THE WORLD NOW AND IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE YOU, WITHOUT OWN LIFE. POORS PERSONS!! LIVE YOUR OWN LIFE AND LET THE OTHERS CAN TO DO THE SAME...
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Where the he11 are you from? We cannot understand your rant! Please speak our language or we will continue to ignore you!

I would rather have a hi maintence girl like Jennifer than NO maintence thing like Anjelino.

jennifer rock's in those jeans..... are they DEGAINE? I'll have to buy some for my girlfriend.

She looks amazing!!

Good luck Jennifer. You have poise, class, style and the respect of many. You are bright,funny, and witty. You look terrific, healthy and fit.You go!!!!!

SHE'S SEXY AS HELL I LOVE ME SOME ANISTON

Wow, I can't believe that Aniston would associate with someone like Woody Allen and Soon Yi. I was really disappointed when Penelope Cruz worked with Allen. This man is a real creep. I don't care if he's talented. Society has to draw the line somewhere and a man who sleeps with and takes pornagraphic pictures of his common law wife's adopted daughter who he has known and helped raise since the adopted daughter was eight is a creep. Mia Farrow and her children were devastated by what Allen did. It is the ulimate betrayal. I no longer feel for Aniston. Her interview in Vanity Fair in 2005 broke my heart. I felt so badly for her. Every time I saw Pitt with Jolie I felt truly upset for Aniston. She was so badly hurt by what she considered to be a betrayal by him. However, her association with Wood Allen, even just a lunch, makes her a hypocrite. Jennifer, if anyone is missing a "sensitivity chip" it's you.
I guess Pitt was right to leave. Maybe, he saw a side to Aniston that the public has never seen as witnessed by her association with someone like Woody Allen. Jolie certainly wouldn't have anything to do with the likes of Allen.

12:13 AM, it's not just because he divorced but just because of the way he divorced. If he was really invested in his marriage, he wouldn't date for a year because of all the pain. Instead he began to enjoy himself immediately with another woman - the exact woman that he was rumoured to have been involved with for months on end. I don't care if it's true or not true - it looks careless and ugly. He is a public figure and he knows that anything he does is in the public eye, so if he thought his actions wouldn't hurt anyone, he is a moron. Nobody should do this to a spouse so soon even if the spouse fails at the bottom line. He must thank his dumb luck for the rest of his life that Aniston was so noble for if she wasn't, more details would come to light and he and his skank Angelina would really get in the neck. By the way, I'm pretty sure that all the nasty campaign about him desperately wanting children and Aniston wanting none was worked out by Brangelina's PR team. They had to say something to look better or their ridiculously high income would be gone. Rumours are not born, they are made - and you only have to ask yourself who they benefit to get the source.

6:21 I'd ather have a billboard jolie forehead than that ape man jaw jennifer has to wake up and see every morning. Thats why she wears her hair then way she does and her hairstyles havenever changed. Her hair has been managed so to cover that jay leno jaw she's rocking. You rarely see her in a ponytail. She's ugly trash anyways. Should've had that baby jen! lol

Does anyone know if Soon-Yi has any type of relationship with her mom, Mia Farrow?

I'm done reading these boards, and will never EVER pay one red cent for US magazine. No one deserves this kind of nasty attack, just for divorcing. Brad Pitt did what 70% of the rest of the population has done, he ended a relationship that had been over for a while. If this woman Aniston, had made the decision to end her relationship amicably, and with dignity instead of CHOOSING to market herself as woebegone loser 'done wrong,' in an effort to 'rally the troops,' AGAINST her ex, and his new family, then these awful nasty tasteless boards on these three people (Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie VS Jen Aniston) would not exist. But she did not. Aniston and her PR team, decided to keep her relevant and keep her attached to Pitt & Jolie's new life and love story. It seems for the lat 4 years Jen aniston and her 'friends,' (the sad hags who do her and her PR agent's dirty work in tabloid magazine articles and on message boards like this one), have been engaged in a one-sided 4 year grudge and tit-for-tat match...with her very existence choreographed to the Jolie Pitts milestone life events. When things backfire in her face, she and her handlers will inevitably go back to the 'source,' which is 'Brad Pitt' -- to once again try to get 'lukewarm by association' (and as US mag demonstrates by hanging her ike the proverbial albatross around Pitt's neck) to milk even more crap tabloid fodder and scare up interest. As someone recently said, 'Marianne Pearl had a shorter recovery period than this woman.' Aniston is the architect of her own misery - she's created her own reality as the 'scorned woman,'/victim/loser of the century...and all of you dumb hags are her enablers. The rest of us, are just nauseated at the constant attacking and harrassment this silly woman's PR games engender.

Talking about childish and predictable. Whenever anyone criticizes Brangelina who is constantly seeking attention, they are labeled as jealous, haters, unhappy or all of the above. Please. There are people who are not jealous, have a good life, and are not Aniston fans who find Pitt and Jolie's child collecting sickening. Some of these people even have expertise in things like developmental psychology and family systems. There are even reasonable people who can assume that Pitt and Jolie are addicted to the thrill of becoming NEW parents and adding numbers. Number of children seems to hold some special fascination for these two moderately talented actors. I would invite people to consider the impact of adding 5 children in three years to a family of children under age 7. The constant moving, lack of a stable home and address, , lack of a neighborhood, lack of a school, and the obvious lack of boundaries is robbing these children of the structure, consistency, and stability that ALL children need. Their chaotic and traveling circus like lifestyle is most certainly not in these children's best interest. Playing a numbers game and dragging small children all over the planet is clearly meeting Pitt's and Jolie's needs and not their children, Face it folks, if you package crap in a beautiful box with paper and ribbons, it’s still crap.

10:57
Perhaps he is offering her a movie. He is a pig, but an excellent talent, and has made many a fantastic movie. Many a famous person from Bette Midler to Diane Keaton have signed deals with Woody .

I don't care if you are team aniston or team jolie but Woody Allen is a creep pedophile molestor who married his son's sister and that makes me sick. I can not believe that hollywood put up with him and the likes of people like him such as Roman Polanski. Where are Jennifer's morals lunching with crap like Allen makes her go down bigtime in my opinion