Quoted from Aniston interview: "Of Mayer bragging about dumping her the first time around, Aniston said, "Trust me, you’ll never see that happen again from that man."

From here on out I am referring to Mayer as "THAT MAN" (add whip sound afterwards).

TO SUGAR :

Rachel wasn't the center of Friends at all!
Sorry for you , there were a bunch of actors/actress much more brilliant than her. look at Couteney Cox or Matthew Perry... Thay are my favourite in this show.

"Samantha Who?" is only based on one character life clearly identified and Christina Applegate leads two characters (Samantha before and Samantha after...)

With Jennifer Aniston, it's always the same all song... she can't hold a movie on her own name she is always with a co-star to back her up...that's just the truth(Bruce almighty, Along came polly, The Break Up, Marley & Me)...while Angelina Jolie starts a career with strong character like Gia CCarangi Biopic, Tom Raider's Lara Croft , or Changeling now in theaters...

SUGAR , by the way, you are not sugar at all, so agressive and so gross... anyway

About my english i doubt I can write like me in another language than you own... lol.

-------------------------------------------
4:07 PM Sugar Says:

Oh please! You treacherous witches are just unbelievable. Just because Friends wasn't called "Rachel, Who?" you can't accept that the Rachel character was the central character in the ensemble - it's the current model for most successful sit-coms and dramadies on TV today. And you, who can barely write English, are far from knowledgeable movie critics. While none are great artistic accomplishments, "Bruce Almighty", "The Break-up", did well at the box office, and "The Good Girl" was a critical success as an Independent film. You sure can say you don't like a film, or don't understand it, but, seriously, if the best you can muster is "they suck" then get off the board and get to class.

THIS IS FOR REAL, WHEN I HEARD HIM SINGING,HE'S SINGING WITH HIS NOSE BEING PINCHED. AND IT'S LIKE SOMEBODY SQUISHING HIM IN HIS .....WHILE HIS SINGING HIS SONGS.

I don't like the way he sounds while his singing.He sounds like he's singing "THROUGH HIS NOSE".It's like if you let somebody sing while you're sqishing their testicles.

Oh please! You treacherous witches are just unbelievable. Just because Friends wasn't called "Rachel, Who?" you can't accept that the Rachel character was the central character in the ensemble - it's the current model for most successful sit-coms and dramadies on TV today. And you, who can barely write English, are far from knowledgeable movie critics. While none are great artistic accomplishments, "Bruce Almighty", "The Break-up", did well at the box office, and "The Good Girl" was a critical success as an Independent film. You sure can say you don't like a film, or don't understand it, but, seriously, if the best you can muster is "they suck" then get off the board and get to class.

I love hearing about John Mayer but I wish there was just a little bit less in plain view for everyone. Maybe his music isn't suffering but his image is. He's a phenomenal guitarist and I miss the days when no one cared about him unless it was for something positive like winning a Grammy or a great single on the radio. Maybe when he gets older..

an answer (below) by John himself, or sponsored by Mayer ...pathetic

First she never had a show on her own, it was always with a bunch of actors/actresses co-starring her...

Then about stan up comedy/ comedy/ music /rythm link, I don't think that justify the fact that Mayer can humiliated a woman and then this woman takes the guy back. I can't believe she is that desperate...

It's a shame , this man is no gentleman @ all... and no personnality by the way.

Clapton told him once he's rather had luxury watches than luxury cars, and Mayer do the same.

Mayer read B.B. King autobiography and his women hooks-up listing, and he try to act this way, a serial lover...

He started to be more than friend with these TMZ dudes and then he dramatically shift ... ( good move lol!)

They belongs together actually. But it's so sad that a woman like JA show such an image of woman to the world. I don't wan't to look like her outside or inside.

VIVA ANGELINA

12:27 PM Sugar Says:

>SO WHY SHE ISN'T ABLE TO HANDLE A SHOW ON HER OWN LIKE "SAMANTHA WHO"'s FANTASTIC CHRISTINA APPLEGATE. Answer: because she's already done that! Then she moved on to other creative interests. Movies. It's just a natural career progression and what smart grown-ups do. Actually, it makes sense that she is with John Mayer now, anyone who knows comedy and comic timing will tell you that it is a lot like music - that instinctive "bah, dah,...bing!" that is often non-verbal and more physical and Aniston has that. So the fact that she's with a partner who also has great timing and a quick wit is all part of that chemistry that is such an intangible and personal connection, but ultra-important.

>SO WHY SHE ISN'T ABLE TO HANDLE A SHOW ON HER OWN LIKE "SAMANTHA WHO"'s FANTASTIC CHRISTINA APPLEGATE. Answer: because she's already done that! Then she moved on to other creative interests. Movies. It's just a natural career progression and what smart grown-ups do. Actually, it makes sense that she is with John Mayer now, anyone who knows comedy and comic timing will tell you that it is a lot like music - that instinctive "bah, dah,...bing!" that is often non-verbal and more physical and Aniston has that. So the fact that she's with a partner who also has great timing and a quick wit is all part of that chemistry that is such an intangible and personal connection, but ultra-important.

We don't judge it but if she was an A-lister as you seems to believe, she acts as if she was 16, going to Ivy and complaining at the same time about papparrazzi...

She must know she is a role model for some of her fan and try to be quiet with her personal life.

And by the way on this case, John Mayer was evil by KISSING and TELLING, but she is still with him. I guess money made him back while she need someone in bed...

Some hollywood dudes are really disgusting!

-------
Oh my, people sure know how to twist the truth! The last time Jennifer gave money on Oprah she was not "reluctant" to give more money. I watched that. She played a game with the audience to encourage them to make her give more. She obviously always intended to give more. It was just set up as a surprise for the guy receiving it. Don't say things that simply aren't true.

She makes women look just fine in my book. Smart and eloquent and successful. People who judge other's relationships when they don't know the first thing about them make women look bad because they somehow assume she didn't have the upper hand in the relationship. Maybe she did all along.

Oh my, people sure know how to twist the truth! The last time Jennifer gave money on Oprah she was not "reluctant" to give more money. I watched that. She played a game with the audience to encourage them to make her give more. She obviously always intended to give more. It was just set up as a surprise for the guy receiving it. Don't say things that simply aren't true.

She makes women look just fine in my book. Smart and eloquent and successful. People who judge other's relationships when they don't know the first thing about them make women look bad because they somehow assume she didn't have the upper hand in the relationship. Maybe she did all along.

What has ANISTON done since she was successfull in FRIENDS?

What does she done to help other human being... last time she made a charitative happening with Oprah Winfrey , she was reluctant to give a lil' bit mor money to help...

I think she'll be more interesting if she were a little less into herself and the way she looks. Why does she need to show her body almost naked to make magazines talks about her life.

How can she go back with this john Mayer who humiliated her in front all the world. He kissed and tell and she is so desperate that she keeps on stuck on him.

She don't show a good image of women I am sorry. that's not hatred, that's just the truth.

Period.

---------------------------------------
11:42 AM Mercy Says:

First, this thread is about Mayer. But it's pretty clear from the venomous attacks on JA that many of the people who post here just abhor goodness, honesty, and Aniston's phenomenal success. What has she done - other than try to succeed in her career and stay true to herself and loved ones - to warrant the judgment, criticism, and hyper-negativity of thousands of [clearly] miserable people who just can't wait to find fault with someone (under 40, mind you) who has successed wildly in her life and career.

Hate and negativity will eat you alive - literally kill you - please get some help with your own demons, people.

Jennifer Aniston seems like an attractive, hardworking intelligent, and nice person to me and I wouldn't dream of analizing, or judge her. I hope she finds someone as special as she is, who will commit to her.

He is weird looking.

ANISTON is a attention desperate wreck.... like her toy-boy MAYER trying to be a G.I. Joe and training to war martial arts while singing songs like " belief" or "waiting of the world to change. PATHETIC!!!

MC CAIN = Old America
OBAMA = New America

ANISTON = D-List Hollywood
JOLIE = A-List Hollywood

MAYER = Wacky late teenager
PITT = Hot & easy man

PERIOD!

Jennifer Aniston
40 years old
CLAIM TO FAME: the very politically correct and monocolor "Friends"
and ARRANGED MARRIAGE with Brad Pitt

STYLE: she is said to be natural and classic, BUT actually she SPORTS the SOFT BIMBO STYLE. Thigt tank , no bra, monokini to show off her body as she is insecure about her face beauty.

NATURAL OR SUPERFICIAL : Playing the natural card , Aniston is in fact a very superficial beauty. She is a brunette turned gold blonde to please the all-america friends viewer. Always brush, it seems she try go far away her greek beauty basis to look like the california girl she isn't...sad. She is always try to hide her big chin and her nose behind her hair. so SUPERFICIAL BEAUTY

aniston + mayer = transexual maniston D-Bag, period!

nope...next