Only if she gets naked,and performs oral sex on me after the show !

I wouldn't spend that kind of money to see Katie Holmes on stage, but people paid $300+ to see the Rolling Stones in concert at Chicago's United Center a few years ago in the first few rows. Even though the economy is sluggish at best right now, someone will spend $300 or more to see the former "Dawson's Creek" star on Broadway. It's their money, not mine.

Is lap dancing included?

Not in a million years, she is not an accomplised actress, role model, woman, nothing. She is simply married to Cruise and because of that (and her new designer closet immitating Victoria Beckham)became famous.She is told what to do, what to say, what to wear.Does she speak at the broadway play? I doubted.... she is a robot.I am sure Suri will be awake in front row at 11:00 pm, drinking from a baby bottle with who knows what inside and a blankie. Instead of sleeping like any other normal toddler in the world.All three with the same haircut, how sick? Really, get a grip....for $350 I have better things to do, and honestly, its not about the money, its the principle!

Maybe if someone paid us each $350.00 to see her we would think about it. Poor girl is so brainwashed by tom and that very dangerous cult. She never had this much bad press before she agreed to become the 3rd mrs.cruise.

No-one seems to be mentioning the fact that All My Sons is a terrific play. It's not like people are paying $350 to watch a waxwork of the actress. All My Sons was Miller's breakthrough as a writer, and arguably he is the greatest American playwright. It's an incredibly moving, down-to-earth and profound piece of work. If the Broadway production is well cast and well directed it may prove to be an amazing evening. Obviously $350 is still pretty obscene for a ticket to anything - but the quality of the evening will not depend on the acting skills or beauty of Katie Holmes.

I think Tom is a has been also, I hope they invested well.

Lets see she's known for her role in Dawson's Creek. When was the last time you ever saw her as the leading character in a movie? In other words, if I won't pay 10.00 to see a movie she's starring in, I won't spend 350.00 to watch a robot up on stage. If I want to see something robotic, i'll pay 60.00 at disneyland and while i'm at it go on a bunch of rides.

You meant would you go to see Katie Holmes on Broadway if she pays you $350 to watch that garbage???

I'd love to see Katie Holmes on Broadway, but sorry, Katie, I don't want to pay $350 to, etc.

Ummm...let me think....NO! It's like one of the above posters wrote: Tom is sucking the life right out of her. She is just like a Stepford Wife. Hmmm....I wonder.......nahhh.....surely not! That was just a movie, right?? :-)

OMG! I totally agree with 5:18. I would pay $350 to see Sir Paul McCartney or someone who is actually a legend. Katie is very pretty, but I would'nt pay to see her in Broadway. She is a good actress. But she hasn't had any films where she is the "MAIN CHARACTER". I don't think she has accomplished that much in her career. But, her daughter is BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!.......................................... and she is married to a legend himself Tom Cruise. But, to bad that doesn't count as a reason to go see her play.

just can't understand !!! i have places to see Jude Law in London next year (Hamlet) , directed by K.Brannagh : about 55 dollars ( 45 euros)!
What does it means ?

She looks good in that picture.

Oh hell no! I need the money for gas! I don't spend money for her movies let alone $350 bucks for a play! I lost interest in her when she married that nut job! She looks 50 yr old when not long ago she was fresh faced & pretty. It is a shame! He is sucking the life out of her!