I agree about scarlett being old Hollywood and she isnt all tatooed up..She is no Ashwaryi Rai or Angie Jolie but she gives pause to a bygonne era that appeals mostly to older people and average women.Linsday on other hand is pretty but when you receive all neg press,it takes its toll on you.

i think that lindsay needs to clean up her act. That alone, besides the fact that scarlett is gorgous and is not a skinny like ll, makes scarlett win this round. and every round.

Attention, citizens. This is the Hollywood elite. You will now believe the following: Scarlett Johanssen has the look of Old Hollywood. We will repeat this message until you believe it. You will not comment on her acting abilities. You will repeat after us.

Scarlett has a beauty classic look of old Hollywood actress.

I am so sick of people saying that scarlett looks like old hollywood. you are disgracing old hollywood actresses by comparing scarlett to them. She is the biggest slut in hollywood to me. I cant stand her...she just makes me so mad. I swear, if people continue to compare her to real beautiful actresses like rita hayworth ava gardner grace kelly and so forth, I'll scream. and I dont like lindsay lohan either.

Scarlett is, of course, the better choice, even thought I like both of them equally. They are both great actors.

Lindsay is more likely to do teenage movies, where Scarlett is more in to classic films. I just saw the movie " MATCH POINT", and Scarlett give a performance to die for. I also love "GIRL WITH PEARL EARRING", saw it several times, and I hardly ever watch anything more than once.

I don't care all that much for Lindsay's movies, but I'm also not a teenager or tween. From what I saw, she is also a great actor who want to have fund, and nothings wrong with that!

Lindsay, Lindsay, Lindsay. How can anyone really think that she does the ad better?! Sure, Scarlett's is pretty funky and kinda strange, but Lindsay just looks weird. She doesn't have that model stare and Scarlett does. Give Scarlett a better ad, and she can do it way better than Lindsay. (Although Scarlett does sound like a man lol)

well my vote is NEITHER! Scarlette looks and sounds like a man (if youve seen her in a film)! While lindsay looks like a druged fugly porstar!

Scarlett has the much sexier campaing in my opinion. She has a classic beauty about her that reminds me of old movie stars in Hollywood's golden age. The above picture is subtle yet sexy at the same time. Nice legs are very sexy and Scarlett has a nice pair. Lindsay's picture is meh, does nothing for me. Scarlett is much prettier and sexier than Lindsay anyways. If you take the "famous factor" out of Lindsay she's a good looking girl, but nothing special. If she wasn't famous, looked exactly the same as she does now and was at a bar or club, no one would do a double take. Go to a college party anywhere in the country and more than 50% of the girls there would be hotter than Lindsay. Make that more than 75% for San Diego and Arizona campuses. I'm a guy and that's my perspective. Scarlett on the other hand is just plain beautiful and she's a 9.5 whether she's famous or not.

WHY DOES US WEEKLY, A LEGIT MEDIA OUTLET, OFFER LINKS TO PEREZ HILTON WHEN EVERYONE KNOWS HE ILLEGALLY STEALS PHOTOS?

women are beautiful in their own ways... everyone has personal flaws.... society is way too caught up on someone's personal life and is too quick to judge them based on tabloid articles. i believe both girls are equally attractive.... one may have a better feature than the other and vise versa. but all in all you people need to quit "hatin" b/c that is their life and not yours.

I think she was rejected cause she has no class and Scarlett does. Who would you invest millions in and want to rep you? A used up pre-21 year old that's been in and out of rehab or a classy no drama girl like Scarlett? hmmmmm

Okay, first of all isn't Lindsay suppose to be out snorting crack somewhere? Personally I don't like either photo. But if I had to choose I'd go with LOHAN because the black and white looks classy and different. The other one looks TOO FUNKY.

Slander is defamatory speech. Libel is defamatory print. If you're going to "threaten" suit, might as well threaten with the appropriate one. And while we're on the subject, the defamatory statement must have been false at the time it was made, and saying that LV is a French company isn't false... but saying that it's Italian is. haha

SCARLETT IS ABSOLUTLY BEAUTIFUL. CLASSIC HOLLYWOOD. SHE WINS HANDS DOWN. AND FOR US MAGAZINE. DONT LISTEN TO HARSH WORDS. I COULDNT WORK 9 HOURS A DAY IF IT WASNT FOR THIS SITE!:)