Rep: Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal "Have Not Split"
Credit: Eric Charbonneau/VF/Getty Images for Vanity Fair
Sunday – November 29, 2009 – 4:54pm
Contrary to reports elsewhere Sunday, Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal have not broken up. A rep for Witherspoon, 33, tells Usmagazine.com: "It's not true. They have not split."
Who are Hollywood's most romantic couple? See the photos
The actress met Gyllenhaal, 28, while filming 2007's Rendition, and the pair stepped out together, confirming their relationship in summer 2008.
Couples who didn't survive: recap Hollywood's ugliest splits
In the April 2009 issue of Elle, the actress gushed about Gyllenhaal. "He's fabulous. He really is a fantastic guy."
Which of the latest celeb couples will last? Hear an expert's take
Witherspoon divorced actor Ryan Phillippe in 2007 after eight years together; they have two children: Ava, 10, and Deacon, 6. After two years together, Gyllenhaal and girlfriend Kirsten Dunst called it quits in 2004.
Soulmates! See stars and their soulmates in this romantic slideshow
Witherspoon told Parade magazine last year, "Things change..But your ability to love remains intact. Oh, I have a lot of hope for love! I do!"
Get more Us! Follow us on Twitter, Friend us on Facebook, Subscribe to Us Weekly
Comments
(31)1 - 20 of 31 | Next »
-
March 18, 2010 - 2:00pm Angelina Says:
who cares. It is their life., she wouldn't be 'my type', if I were a man, though. -
December 20, 2009 - 9:55pm kerry Says:
Plus, she ain't getting any younger... time's a wasting Reese – don't throw away the good ones, they won't be there once you grow up! -
December 19, 2009 - 11:59pm kerry Says:
Nothing seems to be enough for this picky b**** - check out at TicTacDo Just read this and thought about Ms.Witherspoon. It's obvious that Jake was so in love with her and probably bent over backwards to help her be a good mom.She just seems to uptight – sometimes you just have to go with it – nothing will EVER be perfect, Reese! -
December 05, 2009 - 9:26pm PT Says:
It drives me nuts the way the same old story is repeated over and over so that it's taken as truth. If Reese met Jake on the set of Rendition then she never knew her now ex husband's workout buddy and, one can then assume, friend. Ryan and Jake made a movie together with Jake's dad in 1998. -
December 01, 2009 - 8:05pm UV Says:
Reese and Jake never dated, they just signed the fauxmance contract prepared by their shared manager Evelyn O'Neill. -
November 30, 2009 - 12:17pm bg Says:
Revise history much? They were dating way back in early 2007. What's the matter you don't want to make it sound like she was dating while she was married? Does Reese actually own US Weekly? Just wondering. -
November 30, 2009 - 11:27am Tiffanyjk Says:
I read People magazine every week for many years I still trust People magazine :). -
November 30, 2009 - 11:06am Wen Says:
WOW...what a coincidence(sp?). HER stupid movie went straight to DVD and HE has a movie coming up next week. HHMMM?!?!?!?!? Nothing like getting into the tabloids just in time to promote yourself. -
November 30, 2009 - 10:58am Anon Says:
FAKERS!!! They both have something to benefit from this pseudo-relationship. Pathetic! -
November 30, 2009 - 9:55am Tea Says:
Another cheap publicity stunt from Reese and Jake. Can't wait for this fauxmance to be over, can't stand those fakers. -
November 30, 2009 - 9:36am Tasha Says:
Why is it that when so many couples first start dating they will never confirm it and play coy when asked about their romantic life but when there are rumors of a break up then they go to the trouble of making sure to squash those rumors. -
November 30, 2009 - 9:32am Trish Says:
Well, they can't break up if they were never dating. All of H'wood knows Jake and Reese are in a PR arranged situation that benefits both. It will "end" when it serves them both to create another scenario. -
November 30, 2009 - 8:27am Jon Says:
Glad it's not true! -
November 29, 2009 - 11:36pm hal Says:
I don't know if it's true or not but I do find it interesting that here we two stars who are generally very press-shy when it comes to discussing their private lives are suddenly having their reps deny rumors of their break-up. Seems to me they should be doing what they usually do - ignore it. Unless there is some truth to it and they wish to keep it under wrap until they officailly announce it themselves. How many times stars have denied their break-ups when the press start making rumors only to turn out to be true about a month or two later? We'll see. -
November 29, 2009 - 10:48pm Mary Says:
people magazine isn't always right! they are paid for by some stars like brad and angelina who wrote in a contract that they couldn't print negative press about them when they bought one the baby's picture. Star might print a lot of trash but most of the time it has a base to start from! Hope they haven't broken up they make a cute couple! -
November 29, 2009 - 10:16pm Leah Says:
I hope it's not true! They are such a cute couple together!!! -
November 29, 2009 - 9:45pm Robyn Says:
Ohhhh what a beautiful picture of them. -
November 29, 2009 - 9:12pm Skye Says:
Why do people think People mag can't do any wrong in there stories? There just like any other gossip magazine- THEY WANT TO SELL MAGAZINES!! They don't care if it is true or not. Well im glad this is not true this two are a great couple!! -
November 29, 2009 - 9:01pm hmmm? Says:
do you think he might be gay? -
November 29, 2009 - 7:47pm R AND J Says:
People mag won't come up with this kind of stories about stars. There must be some truth to it. If people report the story with wrong source they will retract it .
1 - 20 of 31 | Next »
Comments (31) »