Sex and the City 2: How Much the Clothes Cost!

Tell Us What You Think

5
Comment by signing in with or creating your Facebook account by clicking below.
  • May 31, 2010 - 1:55pm Joann

    Why are people who are homeless, hungry or have children they can't afford except to get welfare cheques and I mean in our Country are expected to be taken care of by those that earned their money? Get an education or at least work at any job and don't bring children into this world in the same environment.

  • April 22, 2010 - 6:42pm Laura

    Ummm...does no one care that the clutch is a python. Or ONCE was a python. And the Pink Lizard bag in another shot. These animals suffer horribly for these overpriced accessories. They are usually banged on the head and skinned while still alive, bodies thrown in a pile while they slowly bleed out and die. SATC (which I LOVE) should be more responsible in their clothing and accessory choices.

  • September 20, 2009 - 9:10pm Anonymous

    Now Sam looks sexy!

  • September 15, 2009 - 9:53am Anonymous

    I just can't believe they will spend all this money on a movie when they can easily help organizations that work with keeping hunger out!!!!!!

  • September 14, 2009 - 8:45am Cena

    i'm sorry samantha, but they dressed u like a hooker once again.. poor girls, they need a better stylist for the movies. she dressed far better in the first movie (besides that horrible gold dress she wore at the end)

4 of 9 photos

Bag Lady

5

Kim Cattrall's Samantha Jones carried a $1,300 VBH Palm clutch in shocking mastice drip python Sept. 8.

ADVERTISEMENT