Already have an account?
Get back to the

Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner Step Out Together Amid Split Rumors: Picture

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner
Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner out for lunch in Brentwood, California on May 28, 2015

What split rumors? Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner defied reports of strife in their nearly 10-year marriage by putting up a united front near their home in the Brentwood neighborhood of L.A. on Thursday, May 28.

Related: PHOTOS: Ben and Jen's love story

The Batman v Superman star, 42, and the Danny Collins actress, 43, were photographed together on Thursday afternoon, just hours after the Alias alum ran errands sans her hunky husband. Both dressed casually for the outing: Affleck in jeans and a crew-neck sweater, Garner in skinny black pants, a black top, and leopard-print flats.

Related: PHOTOS: Jennifer Garner through the years

The couple were also seen that same day in Santa Monica, where they enjoyed some family time with daughters Violet, 9, and Seraphina, 6. (Son Samuel, 3, was not along for the trip.)

The sightings come amid growing chatter about the A-listers' decade-long romance. (Their 10th wedding anniversary is coming up on June 29.) Unconfirmed reports claim that the parents of three are headed for a divorce, and have been spending time apart in recent weeks.

Related: PHOTOS: Ben's bromance with Matt Damon

Regardless, they were very much together on Thursday. And this is not the first time they've been plagued by reports of marital woes. Back in 2013, Affleck riled up speculation about their relationship when he referred to it as "work" in his Oscars speech. 

Related: PHOTOS: Celeb couples, then and now

"I want to thank you for working on our marriage for 10 Christmases. It's good," the Argo director said, addressing Garner, while accepting the Best Picture Academy Award. "It is work, but the best kind of work, and there's no one I'd rather work with."


<iframe width='467' height='263' src='//' allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen></iframe>

In this article