Karina Smirnoff Rocks Tiny, Sheer Bodysuit for Playboy Cover

Celebrity Body April 13, 2011 AT 9:58AM By UsWeekly Staff

Smokin' Smirnoff!

As reported last week, Karina Smirnoff bares all in the May issue of Playboy.

On the just-released cover, the Ukraine-born Dancing with the Stars pro, 33, flaunts her amazing body in a sheer, super-skimpy body suit.

Inside the magazine's pages, Smirnoff poses completely nude in a jaw-dropping pictorial. "As a dancer I've always embraced my body. I'm thrilled to show off my strong, toned physique in the pages of Playboy and celebrate my sexiness," the star tells the mag.

PHOTOS: Inside DWTS rehearsals

The magazine's founder Hugh Hefner broke the news via Twitter last week, calling her naked pictorial "unforgettable."

PHOTOS: Sexy DWTS off-the-dancefloor hookups

Smirnoff, who's currently dancing this season with fan fave Ralph Macchio, is set to wed baseball star Brad Penny this fall.

Tell Us What You Think

Comment by signing in with or creating your Facebook account by clicking below.

July 02, 2011 - 8:58am Dana Fraudin
wow
April 16, 2011 - 9:27am Brenda Robinson
All the girls here that criticize her actually WISH they were her.
April 16, 2011 - 9:20am Brenda Robinson
Kristy Bates, Pamela Ballard, and Elizabeth Aspen are all jealous overweight haters. You just go back to being fat and wishing you were her.
April 16, 2011 - 1:13am Vee Hay
do some women not know they're worth more not showing too much!?
April 15, 2011 - 11:13am Kristy Bates
Her face is plastic and busted....with a butt-chin.
April 14, 2011 - 4:34pm Andres Baldespino
i love karina smirnoff!
April 13, 2011 - 3:12pm Victoria Owens-Homuth
In all fairness to Playboy and those who choose to pose for it, there has never been a photo of a woman with her "legs spread", as in the words of Elizabeth. Now Penthouse on the other hand, is where you would see photography like that.
April 13, 2011 - 2:07pm Gerri Page
You see less coverage on beaches these days but in Playboy, you get paid.
April 13, 2011 - 1:50pm Pamela Ballard Brown
Elizabeth, I couldn't agree more!
April 13, 2011 - 1:09pm Elizabeth Aspen
I'm sorry, but the girl's barely attractive. And what man would be okay with his future wife spreading her legs in a magazine for other men to jerk off over? Classy lady.
April 13, 2011 - 12:41pm Dyanne Triend
As far as I'm concerned she is just about naked..I mean..what is she covering? A couple of cracks..excuse me..but it's true. Same as some girls on the beach, they are just about naked, no pride.
April 13, 2011 - 10:38am Elda Reyes
She is Gorgeous!! that's it, no more bread for me!
April 13, 2011 - 10:11am Diane Stadtherr
I have to say, that I find it quite interesting, that US Magazine has zero problem showing this photo, but ET has put ribbons across her private areas so that they aren't visible. Give me a break. It's not like she's completely naked.